What About Bob?

bigboy“You have to admit, this is exactly what America would utilize cloning technology for.”

So said a food tester about Burger King, one of the major fast food chains in the US, which has recently introduced a new burger, the Big King, which is suspiciously like the Big Mac at McDonald’s — see for yourself.

What’s interesting is that McDonald’s success has been so great that its products are now treated as naturally-found objects, the industry standard, and thus the original — i.e., the thing that is being copied by others — when, in fact, their burger is (unsurprisingly for some) itself a copy. For the Big Mac dates to 1967 and was created to compete with the burgers of what was then a far better established chain, Big Boy (originally Bob’s Big Boy, founded in 1936), and what they claim as being their original double-deck burger.

Just take a look at what Big Boy’s iconic statue is holding.

It’s burgers all the way down.

Silly example? I’m not sure, since it illustrates so nicely that “original” is a rhetorical move and not a factual or descriptive term; dig a little and you’ll find that its use betrays either an arbitrary or a self-interested starting point that we have to adopt in order to say anything about the world. The words “original” or “origin,” then, signal a tacit agreement on the part of interlocutors: “For the purposes of argumentation, grant me that X began at point Y and then we can get on with our business….”

Whether you wish to grant this or not is, of course, your call — if you own a McDonald’s franchise, then you’re probably more than happy being considered the standard against which all others are measured.

But what about Bob?

Discover more from Culture on the Edge

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading