In the story “Why People Exaggerate Religious Behavior” on NPR this morning, Shankar Vedantam and Steve Inskeep discussed a study about self-reports of religious behavior. By comparing reports of religious behavior, specifically prayer in Pakistan, Turkey, and Palestine, to diary accounts and other observations of behavior by the same respondents, the researcher identifies a commonality among those who overreport the behavior, both in this study and prior studies of church attendance in the US. The researcher explains,
The similarity between these two places is that it is the people who think that religion is important, it’s important in their daily lives, those are the people who are overreporting. And those are the people who are overreporting church attendance in the US and those are the people who are overreporting prayer in Turkey, Palestine, and Pakistan.
So, differences in behavior reported on surveys reflect different attitudes towards religion as much as particular differences in behavior. The hosts further assert that the reports of behavior reflect people’s aspirations more than their behaviors. For the researcher, these “mistakes” tell us about the respondents “what they value or perhaps who they want to be or who they think others want them to be.” Perhaps, the report asserts, the overreporting reflects a discomfort with secularization, both society-wide and individually.
However, such conclusions may be a bit too quick. Potential differences in what constitutes activities like “prayer” or even “church” (not to mention “religion”) can mean that what a respondent identifies as religious behavior does not match what an observer considers verifiable behavior. (By the way, Mr. Inskeep, just because someone lives in Pakistan does not mean that they automatically think they should pray five times a day, even if they identify as Muslim.) It seems plausible that some who are reporting that religion is important in their lives and overreporting their behaviors may be exaggerating the importance of religion in their daily lives, too. Thus, the correlation that the researcher identified could reflect the dynamic of responding to surveys more than discomfort with becoming more secular, making the survey results a reflection of its construction and the respondents’ reading of that construction more than the conceptions and practices of the respondents. Similarly, their interpretation of the differences between Pakistan and Turkey conveniently confirms preconceived notions about religious upheaval in Pakistan and secularity in Europeanized Turkey. The analysis of surveys seem to tell us more about the process of surveying and the assumptions and interests of the analysts than about the subjects of the survey.
Clipart from Open Clipart (Public domain)
One Reply to “Overreporting Religion”
Religion is a touchy subject. Although it is often defined as a set of beliefs or rituals shared by a group of people, people also make it seem like in order to be religious, you have to possess a morally sound conscience. Conversely, nonreligious people are often viewed as immoral. You don’t have to be pious to be a good person. You don’t have to attend church on a regular basis, or even at all, to be a good person. You don’t have to pray a minimum five times a day to be a good person I think the people who overreport want to appear much more devout than they actually are. They want to appear more favorable to God/Allah. Many people, religious or otherwise, would consider what they do more of a moral obligation. For instance, non-religious people such as myself are often questioned about why we don’t just do mean and questionable things on a regular basis. Just because you don’t possess a belief/faith in a higher power doesn’t mean you care any less about your fellow man. That may have gotten a bit off topic, but in essence, people who overreport