Muslim Terror

An image of a woman lighting a candle

By Ian Alexander Cuthbertson

On January 29, 2017 six people were killed and others left in critical condition following a shooting at a mosque in Sainte-Foy Québec. What is at stake in classifying this tragedy as a terrorist attack?

Terrorism, however it is defined, remains a key social and political issue worldwide. Given global concerns concerning terrorism and especially so-called Islamic terrorism, it is interesting to note that Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Québec Premier Philippe Couillard both quickly described the Sainte-Foy shooting as a terrorist attack.

An image of Justin Trudeau's tweet regarding the terrorist attack in Quebec

An image of Philippe Couillard's tweet about Quebec terrorist attack

But despite this official labeling, Canadian and international media have used other descriptors. The National Post, one of Canada’s largest English language daily newspapers, described the event instead as the “Quebec City Mosque Shooting” and the Toronto Star, The BBC, the CBC, the New York Times, and the Guardian all ran similar headlines.

While many media sources reported that Trudeau and Couillard classified the attack as terrorism, most chose instead to describe the shooting as merely an attack. Indeed, in many reports the fact that the Prime Minister and Premier considered the attack to be an instance of terrorism was itself deemed newsworthy.

In reporting on this incident, several media sources including the Montréal Gazette and the Globe and Mail ran headlines with the word ‘terrorist’ placed between quotation marks, indicating perhaps that although the attack had been described in these terms by Trudeau and Couillard, they were unwilling to use this descriptor themselves.

An image of a news headline regarding a terrorist attack in Quebec City mosque

An image of a news headline regarding a terrorist attack in Quebec

The day after the attack, the terrorist label had become more common and in subsequent headlines, some media sources later dropped the quotation marks.

But whether the violence in Sainte-Foy is considered a terrorist attack or merely a “terrorist attack” matters. Canada and Québec are not immune to growing anti-Muslim sentiments in the wake of the global war on terror and President Trump’s recent executive order banning immigration from Muslim-majority countries. These anti-Muslim sentiments and the violence and prejudice they encourage have tended to focus on a perceived link between Islam and terrorism or, more accurately, between being a Muslim and committing acts of terror.

Framing the Sainte-Foy attack as terrorism is not merely a matter of semantics. This framing shifts the focus away from so-called “Islamic Terrorism” to Muslim Terror: the terror that Muslim Canadians face on a daily basis in the wake of violence and xenophobic attacks and in the face of proposed provincial laws to police religious clothing and federal laws to monitor “barbaric cultural practices.”

Presently, the motives of the only suspect in the case, Alexandre Bissonnette, are unknown. It will be interesting to consider how the label ‘terrorist’ shifts as these motives are revealed and as the media learns more about Bissonnette’s own religious self-identification (or lack thereof). These shifting classifications reveal not only what we are willing to label terrorism but also shed light on the constructed boundaries between terrorist and victim, between us and them.


Ian Alexander Cuthbertson is Baker Postdoctoral Fellow at Queen’s University and is interested in examining the political and social processes that permit certain beliefs and behaviours to earn the designation ‘religion’ and cause others to be categorized instead as magic or superstition.

2 Replies to “Muslim Terror”

  1. I wrote this piece before Alexandre Bissonnette was charged with murder. Since then, Bissonnette has been called a ‘lone wolf’ and his actions have been described as ‘terrible’ rather than ‘terrorist.’ But my point is not that Alexandre Bissonnette is ‘really’ a terrorist or that he ought to be charged with terrorism. My point is that this labeling might work to reframe what counts as terrorism and shift the focus away from the religion, race, or ethnicity of the attackers to the effects of the attack.

    Campbell Clark, writing in today’s Globe and Mail, seems to pick up on this. Clark writes, “Likewise, by common-sense standards, Mr. Trudeau is clearly right: Sunday’s mosque shooting was a terrorist act. Its only possible result was terror. If it turns out the perpetrator was another unstable young man, it was still terror.”

Comments are closed.

Discover more from Culture on the Edge

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading